It's rem review season. Here's how not to get it wrong.

June arrives and suddenly everyone is having salary conversations. For businesses that get rem reviews right, this time of year is actually an opportunity, not just an obligation.

by Zest People Solutions
by Kate Hemat-Siraky

June arrives and suddenly everyone is having salary conversations. Budgets are being finalised, financial years are closing and managers who have been putting off the hard conversations are now having them all at once, under pressure, without much of a framework.

It doesn’t have to be this way. And for businesses that get rem reviews right, this time of year is actually an opportunity, not just an obligation.

Why rem reviews go wrong

The most common problems with rem review processes aren’t about money. They’re about process, consistency and communication.

Decisions get made inconsistently. One manager advocates hard for their team. Another assumes everyone is happy. Someone misses out not because they didn’t deserve a raise but because no one made the case for them.

Criteria are unclear. People don’t know what performance, progression or market positioning actually means in practice for their pay. So when the outcome lands, even a good one, it feels arbitrary.

The conversation is an afterthought. The decision gets made, a number gets communicated, and the employee is left to interpret what it means for their future with no context and no path forward.

None of this is intentional. It’s just what happens when rem reviews run on gut feel and goodwill instead of a clear process.

What a good rem review process looks like

Start with the data. Before any decisions are made, understand where your people sit relative to the market, relative to each other and relative to the value they’re delivering and the impact they are having. This doesn’t require a complex system. It requires someone to do the work before the conversations start.

Set clear criteria. What are you actually rewarding? Performance in the current role? Progression toward the next one? Retention risk? Market movement? Being explicit about this, even internally, leads to better and more defensible decisions.

Build in a check. Before outcomes are finalised, have someone review the decisions across the team as a whole. Are there patterns? Are women or part-time employees consistently receiving smaller increases? Are the decisions consistent with the criteria you set? This step catches problems before they compound.

Separate the conversation from the number. The salary conversation and the development conversation are not the same thing. One tells someone what they’re worth to the business today. The other tells them what their future looks like. Both matter, and conflating them means one usually gets lost. A tip to avoid confusing the two, some businesses keep the remuneration process separate from the development and performance process. Treating each as an independent business function prevents the conflation of remuneration outcomes with development results.

Career frameworks: the thing most businesses don’t have but should

A rem review process is much harder to run well without a career framework sitting underneath it. A career framework sets out what progression looks like in your business: the levels, the expectations at each level, the skills and behaviours that distinguish one from the next.

Without it, progression conversations are vague. People don’t know what they’re working toward. Managers don’t have a common language for performance. And rem decisions are harder to make consistently because there’s no shared reference point.

Building a career framework doesn’t have to be a massive project. For most businesses, even a simple one, clearly articulated and consistently used, makes a significant difference to how people experience their development and how fairly rem decisions land. This then results in what feels like to employees, a fair and equitable process. Being transparent about how and why remuneration decisions are made helps people feel confident that the process is fair and legitimate.

A note for businesses with sponsored workers

If your workforce includes employees on 482 visas, rem review season carries an additional compliance dimension this year.

From 1 July 2026, guaranteed minimum earnings for 482 visa holders are expected to increase, Core Skills roles from $76,515 to around $79,499, and Specialist Skills from $141,210 to around $146,717. This applies to all new nominations lodged after 1 July, including renewals.

But it doesn’t stop there. 482 salaries are not locked in at the time of nomination. If you nominate a role at the new higher rate after 1 July, any existing employee on a 482 visa performing the same work may need to be reviewed and brought up to that rate too, if that reflects the current market salary. This needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and reviewed regularly, not treated as a set-and-forget.

For businesses with permanent residency applications in progress, the Fair Work High Income Threshold is also expected to rise from its current level of $183,100, though the exact figure hasn’t been confirmed yet. This is worth factoring into any PR planning now rather than later.

Getting this wrong carries real consequences - significant financial penalties and potential suspension or cancellation of your sponsorship rights.

If you’re already running a proper rem review process, you’re most of the way there. The same discipline that leads to fair, consistent outcomes for your broader team applies here too.

The conversations that matter most

End of financial year is when people take stock. They look at what they’ve delivered, what they’ve been paid and what their future looks like. If those three things don’t add up, they start looking elsewhere.

The businesses that retain great people through this period aren’t always the ones that pay the most. They’re the ones that communicate clearly, make decisions people can understand and give their team a genuine sense of what comes next.

That’s worth getting right.

The businesses that do this well take a proactive approach. Rather than waiting for employees to raise the salary question, they review remuneration at a regular cadence and adjust when necessary and where possible, ensuring their people are fairly compensated for the work they do. This is how businesses retain and look after their people.

At Zest People Solutions, we work with businesses to design rem review processes and career frameworks that are fair, consistent and built for the workforce they want to retain. Get in touch with the team to start the conversation.